Abortion is a very emotive issue. And yet it is one that I often shy away
from. But not today. I trust this will be a helpful discussion rather than a hindrance.
The
World Health Organization estimates between 40 and 50 million abortions are
carried out annually worldwide, approximately 125,000 every day.
If abortion is removing a clump of cells which belong to the pregnant
mother (akin to removing a gallbladder or something similar), as perhaps many
of you will think, then perhaps it is ok. And it certainly isn’t murder.
And perhaps you’ll decide right now not to read on.
But if abortion is the removal of a human being, then it begs the
question: is it murder? And if it is, then how should one respond to that?
There are 3 issues that spring to my mind when considering whether
abortion is the killing of an unborn child.
1.
People seem to…well…they seem to know
I’ve been present at the
ultrasound of my 3 children. 'Look, there’s the arms. There’s the head. Oh, it’s
giving me the thumbs up!! 5 fingers, 5 toes, a heart, a stomach, a brain. It’s
a…..It’s a….It’s a….baby!'
It’s a person.
The devastation when we went
for our 12 week scan for our first baby. Again, fingers, toes, a head, 2 arms,
2 legs. But no heartbeat. “I’m so sorry, you baby died perhaps 2 weeks ago”. Despair.
Horror. Why us? Why now? There’s still an empty place
around my table. There should be another voice calling me. ‘Daddy’. ‘Daddy’. But
my baby isn’t here.
In fact, most people who have
scans who I meet talk about seeing their baby on their screen. But did you know
that when women unsure of keeping a pregnancy go for a scan they are often advised
not to look at the screen? ‘Are you sure you want to look?’ the sonographer
will say.
Why do they say that? If it is
only a clump of cells? Why the emotive language surrounding abortion if it were just another operation? It seems like something more is going on.
Last year we
read here about the tragic case of John Andrew Welden who tricked his pregnant
girlfriend Remee Lee into taking an abortion pill pretending it was
antibiotics. The article uses the words “unborn baby,” “abortion
pills,” and “murder.”
So, if a woman asks for an abortion pill signed for by a
doctor it is called choice? But a man hits or tricks the pregnant woman then it
is murder?
Confused? I certainly am.
2.
The evidence of science
Some facts. A foetus has human chromosomes derived
from human gametes. It moves, breathes, grows, reproduces, excretes and feeds. Brain function,
as measured by EEG, is present in the foetus about six weeks after conception.
Responses to tactile sensation (e.g. fist forming) can be observed at seven to
eight weeks' gestation. At nine to ten weeks the foetus squints and swallows;
breathing movements begin at eleven to twelve weeks. By 16 weeks he will
respond violently to stimuli that you or I would find painful. 4D imaging and amazing
films like this one are amazing. Is that really a
person? If not, what is it?
If medical
science points to the foetus as a living being, then even if
people disagree on the details, should the foetus be given the benefit of
the doubt? And if it is a living human being, then would ‘killing’ it be
considered murder as it would be in any other case?
3.
The evidence of the Bible
This will only hold
if you consider the Bible to be the ultimate authority.
It seems that the Bible points to the conclusion that human life begins at conception and that, like other human life, a foetus is made in the image of God and worthy of the utmost respect, protection and empathy. Indeed the Bible makes many specific references to life before birth, for example:
God called Isaiah (Is 49:1) and Jeremiah (Jer 1:5)
before birth and formed Job 'in the womb'. (Job 10:8-9, 18-19). God knitted us together in our mother’s womb (Psalm 139:3-4). Perhaps the
most staggering claim it makes is that God became a baby in a mother’s womb and
that he would grow up as a child as we do. By inference, therefore, Jesus
identifies with the unborn and the preborn.
The biblical
position is that an unborn child has dignity; they are made by God and known by
God. The Bible also calls those who trust in Jesus to give special protection
to the weak and the vulnerable in society.
Why are you even asking the question?
You might now
say: “Why are you asking the question? Are you trying to shock? Are you trying
to belittle and judge those who have made painful and difficult decisions to
abort their child? Are you calling them murderers”?
I guess that
I’m simply seeing where the logic takes us.
If you believe
the above is rubbish, that abortion is not a problem and we should carry on as
we are, then you will find my question irrelevant. The answer will be ‘no’ and
I’m sure you can present many arguments to support your belief (which I haven’t
got space to cover here).
But if you find
that yes, you think it may well be murder, then the question of what to do with
that belief is a valid one. Because if you truly believe something it will
affect your actions.
If you believed
that 189,000 people in the UK a year were being led quietly into clinics to
their deaths you might raise your voice and say something. If you believed they
were innocent and defenceless, you might raise your voice a little bit louder.
Why do they stay quiet?
So if people
believe this, or even that it might at least be a possibility, then why do they
stay quiet?
Is it because
they fear a backlash?
Is it because
pretending the issue isn’t there means they can get on with their daily lives
and remain untouched and untroubled by what would by definition have to be
termed a genocide?
Is it that they
have been convinced by the argument that it would be a greater evil to deny women the equal
right of reproductive freedom (a greater evil than murder!?)?
The noisy ones
But there is a
small minority who do not stay quiet. Who are not browbeaten by the pro-choice
lobby, but who see abortion as the human rights issue of our day.
They raise
awareness.
They challenge our
lawmakers, pointing out that by the letter of the law 96% of all abortions are
illegal.
They seek to offer
unbiased advice and support to women facing unbelievably hard decisions, providing
an alternative to commercial organisations who have a financial interest in aborting
their child.
They seek to address
the root causes of the problem including:
Irresponsible young men who are as much involved as women.
The lack of potential adoptive parents.
The isolation
of many women who feel pressured into abortion as they feel they have no other
option.
Education in
our schools which counts abstinence before marriage as a laughable impossibility
They bear the
cost of their stand to their reputations, to their careers and to their
comfort.
So is abortion
murder? I would say that it is for you to carefully consider, read around, pray
about, and decide for yourself.
But whatever
your conclusion, the final question for all of us must be: will my beliefs
affect the way I act and respond to such an important issue?
I find it curious that your concern seems to be whether the foetus is human or not. Frankly, as an atheist, my only concern is whether it would suffer, whether it would feel any pain. Not whether, by some obtuse definition, it is "human" or not. What does being human even mean in that sense?
ReplyDeleteIf you believe that life begins at conception, then surely any refusal of sex on your part is effectively you denying a potential life a chance. Is it not?
Thanks for reading and thank you for the comment. It seems you raise 3 points here. Firstly, we will all have a view of when life begins, whether at conception, or when we feel pain, or other. Legally, life begins when outside of the womb. I think my point is that this does not square up with what we know from medical science and even in many cases from conscience. My view is to give the benefit of the doubt. Science shows us that a human embryo is a whole living member of the species, in the early stage of his or her natural development. Unless severely damaged, or denied, or deprived of a suitable environment, a human being in the embryonic stage will develop himself or herself to the next more mature development stage, i.e., the fetal stage. So a human life is exactly this - created, growing. Dependent, yes (as are babies and children outside of the womb) but in and of itself a human being, vulnerable and worthy of protection. That is why whether it is human or not is important, because life is to be protected. If it's not human, if it's a growth of cells, then I don't think there would even be a debate here.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, the pain issue I think is irrelevant. It's not ok if I anaesthetise someone before killing them. Why? Because they are a human being. I may allow my vet to do this to my suffering pet rat, but not with human beings, because deep down society recognises the sanctity of a human life.
Thirdly, many people will disagree on when life begins. You could apply the 'denying a life a chance' argument whenever life starts surely? Some would say that if you are not willing to have a child, to bear that responsibility, then don't have sex. Sure, you may plan timing, you may use contraception, but you might still get pregnant. But if you can be convinced that life doesn't start until, say 12 weeks, then abortion is essentially retrospective contraception. If this is the case, then why is abortion under 12 weeks a difficult topic? If it's the same as the oral contraceptive or implant or condoms then why all the fuss? Sorry if I haven't fully answered your question.