Sunday 27 October 2013

Book Review: When Helping Hurts

3 billion people live on less than $2 a day. 11 million children under 5 die from preventable diseases each year. Suffering in this world is untold. The statistics numb us. In fact, you’d be disappointed if I didn’t start with them.

And yet poverty is also right on our doorstep, in our neighbourhood, in our schools, on our way to work. Whilst we are often numb to all of this, the Bible calls EVERY ONE of us to have a concern for the poor – not just a select, keen few (which probably includes you if you have clicked on this link).

This book is being hailed as the best book written on practically serving the poor. Uniquely combining scriptural truth, development principles and practical advice it is (despite the odd title) a must-read if you have any interest in the poorest in our society and a must read for those who long for their churches to minister effectively to the poor.

 
The authors start by outlining the biblical foundations for social concern. Jesus’ task was more than ‘dying on the cross to save us from our sins so that we can go to heaven’. True religion means caring for the neediest on society. The church is to model God’s new community. Personal piety must lead to acts that act justly and love mercy (p41). Jesus is the healer of every human heart, whether rich or poor.
 

"We need to re-grasp a gospel that is for the whole of life"

 
They then move to talk about people. Our material definition of poverty, they argue, is too narrow. Instead poverty is a brokenness that affects numerous relationships, including a person’s relationship with God, self, others and creation (p57-58). That brokenness shows itself in different ways – workaholism, material poverty, strained relationships, physical breakdown through stress etc.

Poverty alleviation is therefore a ministry of reconciliation, moving people closer to glorifying God by living in right relationship with God, with self, with others and with the rest of creation. Helping people discover their dignity as created beings in the image of God, helping then to glorify God by working and supporting themselves and their families with the fruit of that work (p78).
 

“Poverty is rooted in broken relationships" (p62)


The authors also call on Western Christians to address their own ‘God complexes’ (p65). They say that we have a subtle sense of superiority that we believe we have achieved wealth through our own efforts and are anointed to decide what is best for poor people who we view as inferior to ourselves. We can reduce poor people to objects who need development done TO them, and to fulfil my need to feel significant. I find this very challenging.
 

"Until we embrace our mutual brokenness, our work with low-income people is likely to do more harm than good" (p64)


The authors also emphasise that poverty is not just individual but embedded in our societal systems. As Caucasian evangelicals the system has served us well in general, so we are especially blind to the systemic causes of poverty and quick to blame the poor for their plight. Evangelicals tend to believe that systemic arguments for poverty amount to shifting blame for personal sin and excusing moral failure (p93)

Most encouragingly the authors affirm the unique role of the church as the only organisation that have a full-orbed view of the nature and causes of poverty. If we believe that a broken relationship with God underlies much of the brokenness of poverty, then material poverty alleviation MUST go hand in hand with verbal gospel proclamation.
 

"Never lose sight of the goal: reconciling relationships is the essence of poverty alleviation" (p130)

 
Another real highlight for me was the authors differentiating between relief, rehabilitation and development. Often we give relief when in fact we need to be engaged in development which is ‘the process of on-going change that moves all people towards who they were made to be’. Often we hand out relief quickly. It can leaves us feeling good about ourselves, is easier to do than development and is easier to raise donor funds for. Yet inappropriate relief fosters dependency and is relatively short term. Development on the other hand is often slow, gradual and costly.  

The book then moves to the key issue – the local church is uniquely placed to see broken people and systems restored into the image of God. The books gets intensely practical here, providing helpful steps as to how this can be done. The authors argue that starting with assets and not needs is key. Needs-based development assumes that the poor are dependent on outside human and financial resources which can exacerbate feelings of helplessness and inferiority. Therefor you will start by mapping assets of the local community, asking what sorts of services that are already being provided by organisations in the community in which we want to serve. You then map the assets and needs of materially poor in your area as well as discovering the resources that you have in your church community.
 

"Avoid paternalism. Do not do things for people that they can do for themselves"  (p115)


Finally the authors outline and discuss the most common options for churches: job preparedness ministry, financial education ministries and wealth accumulation ministries, along with other options.
Throughout the book the authors insist that poverty alleviation is not about hand-outs but that it must be highly relational. It’s not so much how we can fix poor people but how we can walk together, asking God to fix both of us. We need to aim for highly relational, process-focussed ministries not impersonal, product-focussed ministries.

This book has eye opening truths and insights on almost every page. It has given my church a foundation for our thinking in how we do community work. I urge you to read it as the most important and practically relevant book I have read on poverty and to call your church to move beyond good intentions to effective ministry for a hurting world.  

4 comments:

  1. Sounds like a great challenge, I may place this one on my reading list. However, I would be hesitant if the main point is yet another "DO to be holy" message, as such a message inevitably takes people on a ride of self. While it is very important to have a heart for the poor, as this is clearly a major emphasis of Christ's teaching, it the source of the desire to serve that is the fundamental lesson to learn. As with most of Christ's teaching before the ascension, it is simply impossible to live up to such standards our Lord declared to be necessary to please our Father. Take the sermon on the mount as a clear example. There would be two types of people leaving the mountain that day: The first would take the message as a set of instructions and joyfully apply them to their life, believing it possible to live a Holy life through hearing and application. Inevitably this would fail and bring the individual to a place of brokenness in the realisation of the core inability to live up to such standards. The second person would miss the initial stage of the first person, and simply enter into despair in recognition that such a life is unattainable.

    So what was Christ's point? To bring us into that place of despair and recognise we need more than an external change to be Holy, but an internal rewiring. Praise God that after the ascension, Christ sent the Holy Spirit to bring about such a fundamental change, doing away with the heart of flesh, and placing a new heart seated in Christ, perfect and blameless! Only by the blood of Christ and living in the Spirit are we able to meet the Holy standard set by God.

    Now, why have I gone about explaining this? Because all too often within the church do I meet those who are still grappling for milk, and focusing on self self self, taking a message, believing a quick fix is all that is needed, a try harder attitude, and when it fails, condemnation and the need for renewed forgiveness time and again. Or the "yeah, i'll be one of those who scrapes through" attitude. Or even "I might not want to, but with the Spirit I am able to serve". Why is there lack of serving the poor in a way which resembles that found in scripture? Because the focus is half on Christ, half on self, not a natural and true desire as what comes with total submission to God. When we are taught the fullness of the Truth, and take seriously Christ's words "whoever loses his life for my sake will find it" (Matt 16:24-25), and submit completely to Him, then the desire to serve will become as natural as breathing, as this is the very nature of Christ, the nature we have been granted to partake in (2 Peter 1:4).

    I guess the point i'm making is this: we can challenge ourselves as much as we like, believing this will help us live a more Holy life. But the only way to live a Holy life is to stop looking at ourselves, but to forever lift our eyes to the magnificence of our King and Saviour. The more we focus on Him, and allow Him to reveal the full Truth of our life in Him (Romans 6-8, Ephesians 2:1-10, Colossians 3:1-4), then His servant nature will live through us as the vessels we are.

    The church will reach and serve the poor in a biblical way when eyes are taken off ourselves and placed undivided onto Him, then the servants nature will naturally be our hearts desire. The whole gospel truth, and the cost, that is the real challenge.

    What are your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Phil

    Great to hear from you!

    This is good stuff, I wholeheartedly agree. It is complex area and can feel overwhelming to look at - you are right that as we look to God we find reassurance that He is in control and WILL redeem all things to himself.

    The only thing I would say to this is - what does it look like in practice? To look at Jesus and yet also to be those who are sent by him to do good works, to heal the sick, to bring others to glorify Him? This undoubtably means action. I believe the authors start from the Word, looking at Jesus and what his life means for us now, but then get unapologetically practical about how this might look.

    They seem to have a good balance between extremes others fall in to. On the one hand, to be so spiritual that there is no practical application (and Jesus was INTENSELY practical). Or to be so practical that they lead into legalism. The key is integrating, being able to look at Christ whilst also looking at the world around us, asking Him to help us see it through his own eyes. This is the unique challenge.

    It can be easy to thin that if we focus on the truth of the gospel that people would as a by-product live missionally. I have been in churches where the whole emphasis is eyes off myself, eyes on God, very solid, very 'Bible 'based'. I believe that it is when we take up the mission of Jesus that our hunger for Him increases. In other words, mission drives nurture. As I look at the world around, as I respond in practical action, my love for God has increased and my dependence on Him with it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. "The key is integrating, being able to look at Christ whilst also looking at the world around us, asking Him to help us see it through his own eyes."

    "I believe that it is when we take up the mission of Jesus that our hunger for Him increases."

    In the words of the hip youngsters of our age "yeah, toats man". Otherwise the attitude of passiveness can lead to inaction, as though we were simply a puppet with no ability to respond to His call. But we cannot do anything truly effective unless the origins are from a desire in the heart, brought about by the totally radical transformation from the body of sin into the body of Christ, the foundational understanding of the cost of giving oneself to the King.

    Once this milk has been digested, we can then obey the call of the Lord in our hearts in recognition and knowledge of Christ living through us, the attitude of young men beginning to feed on meat. There is an abundance of biblical support for the responsibility on our part to obey the prompting of the Spirit, in the knowledge that we only really have one choice; God's way, or our way, which in reality is the way of the lie of 'independance' that is satan's spirit. Then we can recognise that the desires in our heart to obey God and live a servant life that is Christ like are not simply desires to DO good, but are the desires of our true nature and self in Christ, to BE who we are in reality.

    I guess this is my understanding of the inner workings of the gospel. Many times I have worried that i'm not actively serving as much as I could, and getting focused on other things in life. However I have come to find peace in knowing that my life is wholly Christ's, and as long as I am willing to submit to and obey Him, it is not my worry where I am or what I am doing right now, because I can believe that He will work in and through me wherever He sees fit. That is the challenge I have found most difficult, learning to be patient and wait for His timing and provision. The important thing is to be in a place of contentment in the completed works of Jesus, for in that quiet peace we are able to hear His voice and respond in obedience and not from guilt.

    I love the fact there are so many in our family who truly love and serve God, I feel it has been far too long since I last saw you! Thanks for your blogs John, i've enjoyed reading them all so far ;).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great points Phil, I very much agree. The fact we are a body is also important. Some people are very 'up' focussed and others naturally more 'out' and they go for practical stuff very easily. Each needs the other, the 'up' view as you brilliantly describe, and the out view so those who are more 'up' orientated don't remain passive. Of course we each need to seek to integrate,but ultimately it's in the body,the church, that we see God moving through different personalities and temperaments too. But yes, the danger of activsm in our own strength is something to guard against for sure!

    ReplyDelete

www.hypersmash.com